mirror of
https://github.com/Abdess/retroarch_system.git
synced 2026-11-01 00:27:20 -05:00
docs: built_by names who ships a build
The resolver reads built_by as the platforms on which a core name means this build. Its definition said platforms that compile a libretro build, which excludes a standalone build a platform installs from the project's release. The field now says what it decides: platforms that ship this build under its core name, compiled or installed from the release.
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
cee77bebe0
commit
f111e1c505
2 files changed
+2
-2
No files matched your search
+1
-1
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ which CI validates every profile against.
|
||||
| `source_commit` | no | commit SHA of `source` the code was read at. Anchors every `source_ref` line number |
|
||||
| `upstream_commit` | no | same, for `upstream` |
|
||||
| `source_branch` | no | branch `source` was read from when it is not the default one (a port living on a pull request branch). profile_sync follows it |
|
||||
| `built_by` | no | platforms that compile this libretro build themselves (Recalbox's `mame0278`). Such a profile is reached only by a platform naming it in `cores:`, never by `all_libretro`: the buildbot does not publish it |
|
||||
| `built_by` | no | platforms that ship this build under its core name, compiled by them or installed from the project's own release (Recalbox's `mame0278`, the GSplus legacy build). On those platforms the name resolves to this profile, never through `all_libretro`: the buildbot does not publish it |
|
||||
| `bios_mode` | no | `agnostic` when the core takes any file of the right shape in its BIOS folder instead of a fixed name (PCSX2). Packs then carry every matching dump, and a `<bios>.bin` placeholder stands for them |
|
||||
| `bios_directory` | no | the folder an agnostic core scans, relative to the system directory (`pcsx2/bios/`). A scan never seeds from files outside it |
|
||||
| `display_name` | no | full display name (e.g. "Sega - Mega Drive (BlastEm)") |
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user